Mark Wahlberg doesn’t deserve a pardon, says the woman who prosecuted him for beating up two Vietnamese men in 1989.
Mark Wahlberg recently filed a petition seeking to have a 1988 assault and robbery conviction… Read more defamer.gawker.com
“In the 13 years I served in the attorney general’s office, I recall only one instance of a defendant violating a civil rights injunction — Mark Wahlberg,” former prosecutor Judith Beals wrote this week in the Boston Globe.
I’m glad Mark Wahlberg has turned his life around. I’ve read that Hoa Trinh has forgiven him. But a public pardon is an extraordinary public act, requiring extraordinary circumstances because it essentially eliminates all effects of having ever been convicted. It is reserved to those who demonstrate “extraordinary contributions to society,” requiring “extensive service to others performed, in part, as a means of restoring community and making amends.” On this, I am not sold.
First, Wahlberg has never acknowledged the racial nature of his crimes. Even his pardon petition describes his serial pattern of racist violence as a “single episode” that took place while he was “under the influence of alcohol and narcotics.” For a community that continues to confront racism and hate crime, we need acknowledgment and leadership, not denial.
Another woman, Kristyn Atwood, was 9 when Wahlberg and his friends threw rocks at her and her friends’ heads while they were out on a school field trip.
“When people talk about racism in Boston, I always remember that,” Atwood told the Globe. “For him to try to get it overturned and make it seem like it never happened? I don’t think that’s fair.”